www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming052607.htm
What did you expect was going to happen? That we be consulted? Ha! Oh, there's a surprise - former PM Jean Chretien acted out of "cynicism." Tell us something we didn't know. You know, people are so busy harping on Harper they quickly forgotten how incredibly self-serving and arrogant the thief-oriented, morally and intellectually deprived Liberals were. With apologies to Mr. Dion who seems like a decent guy.
The environmentalists are essentially saying the debate is closed - that they are supported by science. In many ways they are. On the other hand - ironically - they think that they are muzzled in the halls of public opinion. Cripes, they are about to flip the world economy in case anyone hasn't noticed.
Others, including scientists and moderates, want to discuss this a tad more given the extraordinary costs and adjustments needed to implement ambitious (if not dubious) environmental plans. You can't go around legislating laws at the expense of business and the economy (and people at large) willy-nilly. There has to be a proven end point for the pain about to be inflicted. Worse, we shouldn't put such important issues in the hands of politicians willing to easily bend over like Jenna Jameson for cheap and cynical political votes.
The environmentalists (and the politicians they have convinced) say they know what's good for us - who doesn't know what's good for us? It's all we hear now. Do this, think that, be like me this.
Do me a favour, hug a true liberal, libertarian or conservative because they'll be the only friends we'll have in the face of damn neo-communists. Yeah, that's right. I'm labeling because these people are starting to step on my twinkle toes.
So who will assess the costs and who will pay once we realize the error of our decisions?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.